[postgis-users] shp2pgsql -n

Richard Greenwood richard.greenwood at gmail.com
Mon May 26 11:00:55 PDT 2008


Thanks. It's at:
  http://code.google.com/p/postgis/issues/detail?id=29

Rich


On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca> wrote:
> Yes, it's a bug. File it, please, preferably with an example DBF file.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/postgis/issues/list
>
> P
>
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 7:36 AM, Richard Greenwood
> <richard.greenwood at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The new -n option in shp2pgsql is a great addition. However I have
>> found that if the source DBF is not "packed" deleted rows are inserted
>> into the postgis table. I am not sure if "packed" is the correct term,
>> but if the DBF has rows that are flagged for deletion they are still
>> inserted into the postgres table. This seems like a bug, but I'll
>> defer to higher authority.
>>
>> Rich
>>
>> --
>> Richard Greenwood
>> richard.greenwood at gmail.com
>> www.greenwoodmap.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-users mailing list
>> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>



-- 
Richard Greenwood
richard.greenwood at gmail.com
www.greenwoodmap.com



More information about the postgis-users mailing list