[postgis-users] Coordinate changes using transform from 1.3.1 to 1.3.6

[Paul Ramsey]

You can independently verify if the problem is in proj by using the
'proj' utility on both machines to translate one of your coordinates
and see if they concur. It is more likely a proj difference than a
PostGIS one.

P

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Ben Madin <ben at remoteinformation.com.au> wrote:
> G'day Miguel,
>
> On 26/05/2009, at 8:23 PM, Miguel R. Luaces wrote:
>
>> First DBMS:
>>
>> SELECT version(), postgis_full_version();
>>
>> "PostgreSQL 8.2.13 on i686-pc-mingw32, compiled by GCC gcc.exe (GCC) 3.4.2
>> (mingw-special)";"POSTGIS="1.3.1" GEOS="3.0.0rc4-CAPI-1.3.3" PROJ="Rel.
>> 4.5.0, 22 Oct 2006" USE_STATS DBPROC="0.3.0" RELPROC="1.3.1" (needs proc
>> upgrade)"
>
>
>> Second DBMS:
>>
>> SELECT version(), postgis_full_version();
>>
>> "PostgreSQL 8.2.13 on i686-pc-mingw32, compiled by GCC gcc.exe (GCC) 3.4.2
>> (mingw-special)";"POSTGIS="1.3.6" GEOS="3.1.0-CAPI-1.5.0" PROJ="Rel. 4.6.1,
>> 21 August 2008" USE_STATS DBPROC="0.3.0" RELPROC="1.3.6" (needs proc
>> upgrade)"
>
>
> I'm sure you can see the difference between postgis and especially proj
> versions from this. I would guess you will need to either upgrade one
> machine or downgrade the other to be able to expect absolute concurrence.
>
> cheers
>
> Ben
>
>
> --
>
> Ben Madin
> REMOTE INFORMATION
>
> t : +61 8 9192 5455
> f : +61 8 9192 5535
> m : 0448 887 220
> Broome   WA   6725
>
> ben at remoteinformation.com.au
>
>
>
>                                                        Out here, it pays to
> know...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>