[postgis-users] KML: unix vs windows

[Laurens Jansen]

Hi Regina

2010/1/18 Paragon Corporation <lr at pcorp.us>:
> Laurens,
>
> Not sure you are following this thread.
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/387
>
I am following the thread, but was also trying to get meself some to eat ...:P

> I checked and noticed the spatial_ref_sys records for 28992 are different on
> 1.36 and 1.4.1/1.5 installs (my answers on Linux behave the same way as
> windows so I don't think its a packaging problem)
>
> So if you like the 1.3.6 answer better -- updating the proj4text to the one
> in 1.3.6 might do the trick.  Though I suspect that may not be the right
> solution since I have no clue which is right or if one is designed for a
> newer proj library.
>
>
I will try to update tha spatial_ref for the 28992 records; dunno
which is better also, but since the 1.3.6-answer are the ones that
seems be right i asume they are somehow more correct ...

> Hope that helps,

I will let u know
> Regina
>
Regards Laurens
> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-users-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
> [mailto:postgis-users-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Laurens
> Jansen
> Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 12:37 PM
> To: PostGIS Users Discussion
> Subject: Re: [postgis-users] KML: unix vs windows
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> Enclosed i added a sample sql.dump of the table; i think u should be able to
> restore etc and run some tests?
>
> regards laurens
>
> 2010/1/18 Picavet Vincent <Vincent.Picavet at mediapost.fr>:
>> Hello Laurens,
>>
>>> ad 1: as_EKWKT? Hmm .. i can't find that function in the postgis
>>> functions, perhaps u mean 'asewkt'? A select with that function does
>>> give tha same result sets on both platforms:
>>> SELECT asEWKT(the_geom) FROM table WHERE gid = 1 results UNIX
>>> "SRID=28992;MULTIPOLYGON(((121197.452 483388.474 0 0,121194.232643364
>>> 483391.530431554 0
>>> etc etc
>>> results Windows
>>> "SRID=28992;MULTIPOLYGON(((121197.452 483388.474 0 0,121194.232643364
>>> 483391.530431554 0
>>> etc etc
>>
>> Could you please post a fully self contained example ? Something with
>> the geometry itself inside the query, so that I can execute your query
>> on my own ? I've got several windows boxes with various flavours of
>> windows, postgresql and postgis installed and can test this strange
>> behaviour if you give me a working query without prerequisite.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vincent
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-users mailing list
>> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>