[postgis-users] parsing postgis answers

[Paul Ramsey]

I'm thinking that we could leave the canonical output the same for
st_extent while enhancing the output type to incude an srid, so it
will become possible to do things like

geom && st_extent(..something..)

and have it evaluate, which would be a nice improvement, since the
extent box could then cast correctly back into geometry

p.

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Sandro Santilli <strk at keybit.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:10:34PM +0100, Michał Drożdż wrote:
>>    Thanks!
>>
>>    Both solutions sound great!:)
>
> Beware of the regexp solution as ST_Extent output might change
> to include a SRID in PostGIS-2.0.
>
> --strk;
>
>  ,------o-.
>  |   __/  |    Thank you for PostGIS-2.0 Topology !
>  |  / 2.0 |    http://www.pledgebank.com/postgistopology
>  `-o------'
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users