[postgis-users] Whew

[Eric Aspengren]

thanks for the follow up! I may put in a ticket.

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Paragon Corporation <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:

> **
> Not included at the moment.  Would require putting an entry in the
> loader_generate_tables and also companion structures for each table in
> tiger schema and mostly a lot of testing
> mostly because census seems to like to change field names etc. every year.
>
> It's something we've thought about just adding these common entries, but
> having them possibly disabled by default so people could choose to load
> them if they wanted.
>
> If you are interested you can put in a ticket:
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/
>
> And mark it under tiger geocoder and version 2.1.
>
> We don't plan to make any more changes (aside from major bug fixes) to the
> tiger_2010 (pacakged with 2.0)  since tiger_2011 is already vastly
> different and more efficient in the way it loads and the client that is
> funding most of our work on tiger geocoder is using the tiger_2011 one
> packaged with PostGIS 2.1 (though using it on a PostGIS 2.0 database)
>
> Thanks,
> Regina and Leo
> http://www.postgis.us
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* postgis-users-bounces at postgis.refractions.net [mailto:
> postgis-users-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] *On Behalf Of *Eric
> Aspengren
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 12, 2012 11:20 AM
> *To:* PostGIS Users Discussion
> *Subject:* [postgis-users] Whew
>
> Ok, so, I've finally gotten a functional geocoder up and running.
>
> Has anyone had any luck using the scripts provided to load other Tiger
> files (Congressional Districts, Statehouse Districts, Etc.)?
>
> --
> Eric Aspengren
> (402) 478-VOTE
> ericaspen at gmail.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>
>


-- 
Eric Aspengren
(402) 478-VOTE
ericaspen at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-users/attachments/20120713/b2e367cb/attachment.html>