[postgis-users] problem with raster2pgsql

Bborie Park bkpark at ucdavis.edu
Thu Mar 8 10:37:32 PST 2012


I just double-checked the images on QGIS 1.7.3 using the latest GDAL
trunk (r24093) with the PostGIS Raster plugin.

I've attached screenshots in QGIS.

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Bborie Park <bkpark at ucdavis.edu> wrote:
> Cheryl,
>
> I took a look at your adjusted images and they fine by me.  I loaded
> the PNG files into PostGIS Raster and ran an ST_Histogram on the
> aspect image to see if the data is there.
>
> I called raster2pgsql with the following...
>
> raster2pgsql -t 50x50 -I -C -Y Aspect.png aspect > aspect.sql
>
> My bet is that there is something wrong with QGIS, which uses GDAL to
> access PostGIS raster.  There is another email thread related to
> PostGIS raster access using GDAL and problems arising from that.
>
> -bborie
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:07 AM, cheryl buckley <cheryl.bckl at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi bborie and Pierre,
>>
>> I am not too sure if what I did was a hundred percent correct. I was
>> thinking perhaps I am suppose to make a setting in QGIS to obtain a
>> corrected image, and not alter the "-t 100x100" in the raster2pgsql
>> command line, i'm not too sure. But, non-the-less find attached zip
>> folders (screenshots) of my images I generated. The first set is the
>> faulty images with the "-t 100x100" and the second set is the images
>> generated with a "-t 300x300".  Please note that the hillshade image
>> in this case also came out faulty. I also made screenshots of the
>> histograms of the images. Perhaps this will now shed some light.
>> Please do confirm if you were able to unzip the images and view them.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Pierre Racine
>> <Pierre.Racine at sbf.ulaval.ca> wrote:
>>>> Yes.  All tiles of a raster will have the same dimensions.  So an edge tile would
>>>> have the same dimensions as every other tile, just that some of the tiles have no
>>>> data.
>>>
>>> Probably no link with the bug being discussed but I'm curious. What happen when the raster do not have a nodata value defined and you have to pad some tiles?
>>>
>>> Pierre
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
>>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Greetings
>> Cheryl
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-users mailing list
>> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Bborie Park
> Programmer
> Center for Vectorborne Diseases
> UC Davis
> 530-752-8380
> bkpark at ucdavis.edu



-- 
Bborie Park
Programmer
Center for Vectorborne Diseases
UC Davis
530-752-8380
bkpark at ucdavis.edu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: qgis_aspect.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1013749 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-users/attachments/20120308/74ad37f1/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: qgis_hillshade.png
Type: image/png
Size: 723556 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-users/attachments/20120308/74ad37f1/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the postgis-users mailing list