[postgis-users] Status of Postgis-related rpms

[Max Pyziur]

On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Bborie Park wrote:

> There shouldn't be any issues between PostgreSQL 9.2 and PostGIS 2.0. If there are, they'd be Fedora derived problems...

Is there any chance that this will be corrected for Fedora 18? 
Technically, Fedora 18 won't go EOL until until one month after the 
release of Fedora 20; it would be nice to have these F18 packages 
available (PostGIS 2.0 and other related packages such as gdal, etc.)


> -bborie

Max Pyziur
pyz at brama.com

> 
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Max Pyziur <pyz at brama.com> wrote:
>
>       Greetings,
> 
>
>       With the release of Fedora 18 there were interoperability issues with PostGIS and Postgresql. Fedora 18 was released with PostgreSQL 9.2.x and PostGIS 1.5.x. Given
>       the mutual release schedule, only releases of PostGIS 2.0.x and higher can work with PostgreSQL 9.2.x.
>
>       I see that Fedora 19 ships with PostGIS 2.0.3 and PostgreSQL 9.2.4. Do these packages work together correctly, or are there still issues?
>
>       Much thanks,
>
>       Max Pyziur
>       pyz at brama.com
> 
>
>       On Mon, 13 May 2013, Max Pyziur wrote:
> 
>
>             Or should we wait for Fedora 19?
> 
>
>             Max Pyziur
>             pyz at brama.com
> 
>
>       _______________________________________________
>       postgis-users mailing list
>       postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>       http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
> 
> 
> 
>