[postgis-users] [GENERAL] $foo $bar is BAD

Regina Obe lr at pcorp.us
Sun Apr 17 23:55:46 PDT 2016

I think people often spend too much time trying to find offensive meaning in things rather than doing useful things.


BTW if I happen to throw in a regression test (which I was planning to cause it was truly a bug)




Of the form


SELECT pprint_addy(addy), ST_AsText(ST_SnapToGrid(geomout,0.001)), rating 

FROM geocode_intersection('Cumming St', 'Seaman Ave', 'NY');



Is someone going to pull me aside and read me the riot act?




From: postgis-users [mailto:postgis-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Steve Cole
Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2016 5:02 PM
To: PostGIS Users Discussion <postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [postgis-users] [GENERAL] $foo $bar is BAD


Huh?  Seriously?


On Friday, April 15, 2016, Peter Devoy <peter at 3xe.co.uk <mailto:peter at 3xe.co.uk> > wrote:

On 16 Apr 2016 3:21 am, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com <javascript:;> > wrote:
> For whatever it's worth, given the CoC discussions I didn't find that
> especially funny (or offensive or anything), but I did think it the
> sort of thing that could annoy people already sensitive to this sort
> of thing.
> A
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 03:00:59AM +0100, Peter Devoy wrote:
> > > Although people commonly use $foo $bar in examples, it is actually a misuse of a VERY rude acronym.
> >
> > > The next time you need to make an example, please try being a little more original (or meaningful) with your variable names.
> >
> > In light of recent CoC decisions, I would like to propose the
> > opposite.  I think more expletives would
> > diversify the language of the documentation and lower the barriers to
> > contribution by individuals more
> > dispositioned to use colourful language due to their cultural and/or
> > socioeconomic background. O:-)
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general at postgresql.org <javascript:;> )
> > To make changes to your subscription:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com <javascript:;> 

I shall note that it's still too sore a topic for list humour.  I hope
that anyone I may have annoyed
can seek comfort in the fact that I am an egalitarian and, by
extension, if I have accidentally
annoyed anyone, it is my sincere hope that I have annoyed everyone else equally!

And with that in mind, I was half serious about my point RE: the docs,
albeit an absurd one.  The
subtext was that, to me, it seems that an argument for removing 'rude'
words should hold as much
weight as one for introducing them or doing nothing at all.

Best wishes

postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org <javascript:;> 




Corporate whipping boy.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-users/attachments/20160418/b359a065/attachment.html>

More information about the postgis-users mailing list