[OSRS-PROJ] Older Stateplane Definitions ???
Frank Warmerdam
warmerdam at pobox.com
Mon Jul 29 06:16:37 PDT 2002
Gerald Evenden wrote:
> All longitude is from the geographic coordinate origin *which is not*
> *explicitly defined.* So it can just as well be relative to the French
> origin.
> The later, proj, definitioin is not in error unless one assumes that the
> Greenwich origin is used.
>
> To use Greenwich data with proj one can merge the 2.33 correction into
> the lon_0 factor.
Gerald,
Indeed the problem comes in part as we try to go beyond using PROJ as a
package for transforming between projected coordinates and geographic
coordinates to converting between arbitrary coordinate systems ... a task
that wasn't originally in-scope for PROJ. As you warned when I introduced
the datum shift code expanding PROJ into a general coordinate system to
coordinate system package leads to a variety of problems though in my
opinion they are not insolvable, and are worth addressing.
To address this I am thinking that perhaps I should add a +pm (prime
meridian) flag for PROJ. This would basically only be used when converting
lat/long values with different prime meridians (ie. by the new cs2cs program)
and wouldn't affect the core pj_fwd() and pj_inv() actions ... much like the
datum stuff is ignored by the core code.
I am submitting the idea of the +pm flag to bugzilla as:
http://bugzilla.remotesensing.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186
Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for Rent
----------------------------------------
PROJ.4 Discussion List
See http://www.remotesensing.org/proj for subscription, unsubscription
and other information.
More information about the Proj
mailing list