[Proj] Re: Global Gauss-Kruger and libproj4---the final story

[strebe]

I have no quarrel with how libproj4 addresses the problems of projection. Nothing prevents anyone from writing a wrapper that moves any remaining burdens away from the client while still keeping them separate from libproj4's responsibilities. The dispute was in the existence and nature of those burdens, not whether libproj4 is "deficient". Libproj4 is a valuable product as it stands.

Again, I apologize for the unseemly exchange. It probably was not relevant to most users of libproj4. If anyone wants to discuss boundary problems they are grappling with, feel free to contact me privately.

Regards,
-- daan Stree


On Aug 29, 2008, at 2:25:04 PM, "Christopher Barker" <Chris.Barker at noaa.gov> wrote:
From:   "Christopher Barker" <Chris.Barker at noaa.gov>
Subject:    Re: [Proj] Re: Global Gauss-Kruger and libproj4---the final story
Date:   August 29, 2008 2:25:04 PM PDT
To: "PROJ.4 and general Projections Discussions" <proj at lists.maptools.org>


strebe wrote:
> 
> Timeline:

You've got to be kidding!

It's clear to me that you both understand the issues at hand, only 
really disagree on how best a projection library should address them.

Why in the world are you arguing all these symantics?

You both are being big babies here -- please stop!

-Chris




-- 
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer

Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R            (206) 526-6959   voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE   (206) 526-6329   fax
Seattle, WA  98115       (206) 526-6317   main reception

Chris.Barker at noaa.gov
_______________________________________________
Proj mailing list
Proj at lists.maptools.org
http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/proj

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20080829/3cce0dd6/attachment.html>