[Proj] [Live-demo] Fwd: [OSGeo-Live] Proj4 documentation

[Julien Moquet]

Hi,

>> It would be ok to say "Proj4 has been translated into other languages,
including proj4js, ..."
> Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too ..

I am fully agree too.




And as OsGeoLive aims to be multilanguages, I can help on the proj4 French
Translation pages.

Regards,


2017-05-31 22:15 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>:

> On jeudi 1 juin 2017 05:57:38 CEST Cameron Shorter wrote:
>
> > Hi Evan,
>
> >
>
> > Yes, MetaCRS was a project gathering all the Proj4 projects together.
>
> > However, it appears that proj4 is the only project in that grouping
>
> > which is active?
>
> >
>
> > Hence my thoughts are that "MetaCRS" should be dropped from OSGeo-Live
>
> > as a concept and "Proj4" be used instead. It would be ok to say "Proj4
>
> > has been translated into other languages, including proj4js, ..."
>
> >
>
> > Your thoughts are welcome.
>
>
>
> Regarding what is listed currently in metacrs :
>
> - proj4js: no opinion
>
> - cs-map: no-opinion
>
> - geotiff/libgeotiff: heavily used underneath by GDAL in particular,
> mostly in maintaince mode, but can be treated as a technical dependency
> that doesn't require to be visible from users.
>
> - proj4j: no opinion
>
> - spatialreference.org: not maintained in years. http://epsg.io/ would be
> a possible replacement
>
>
>
> Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too ... meta for folks exploring
> OSGeo-Live content, so it could make sense exposing proj.4 as a standalone
> project.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
>
> http://www.spatialys.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20170601/7e3b5761/attachment.html>