[Proj] PROJ PSC

[Kristian Evers]

I am also on board with this. Certainly makes more sense than the current setup.
Using the GDAL/MapServer PSC rules is a good idea - we don’t need to reinvent
the wheel.

Forming a PROJ PSC is effectively breaking out of MetaCRS. The MetaCRS PSC
guidelines [0] does not cover that topic but a vote seems to be in order. To ensure
the formalities are kept. This would in all likelihood be the last vote for the MetaCRS
PCS.

/Kristian

[0] https://trac.osgeo.org/metacrs/wiki/PSCGuidelines

On 31 May 2018, at 22:10, Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com<mailto:even.rouault at spatialys.com>> wrote:

On jeudi 31 mai 2018 15:00:29 CEST Howard Butler wrote:
All,

In the interest of self determination, I propose that PROJ form a PSC
with the following membership:

+1 (of course voting in a bootstrapping phase is a bit tricky :-) )

Actually the GDAL PSC rules are in
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc1_pmc

And they are exactly the same as the MapServer ones in
http://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-23.html

Those governance rules have proved to be robust for the 2 projects (I believe
a few others have taken inspiration from them too) for more than 10 years now.

Even

--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
_______________________________________________
Proj mailing list
Proj at lists.maptools.org
http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/proj

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20180531/34964502/attachment.html>