[Proj] PROJ PSC

[Frank Warmerdam]

Howard,

I can imagine a few ways forward:

 - We could just add the named contributors to the MetaCRS PSC and it might
be that only those interested in PROJ.4 vote on PROJ.4 proposals.
 - We could form a PROJ PSC and have the MetaCRS PSC authorize it to make
decisions about PROJ.4 on a slightly less officious basis than normal PSC
rules.
 - We might want to consider the MetaCRS "experiment" to have run it's
course and not worked out particularly well and dissolve MetaCRS other than
perhaps as a potentially mailing list for coordination of related projects,
and proceed with PROJ.4 as an independent project with it's own PSC, etc.

I'd be happy enough with the third approach.  MetaCRS was mostly my
brainchild and I'm willing to agree it is not really a functioning thing.

Best regards,
Frank


On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 2:06 PM, Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote:

>
> Howard Butler <howard at hobu.co> writes:
>
> > In the interest of self determination, I propose that PROJ form a PSC
> > with the following membership:
>
> No objection to the concept, but this raises the issue of whether the
> project is operating under the aegis of charitable nonprofit
> corporation.  I admit to having no clue about that before, and I'm not
> saying it's a big deal, but clarity is good.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Proj mailing list
> Proj at lists.maptools.org
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
>



-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,
warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows |
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Software Developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20180531/07fbc2b9/attachment.html>