[PROJ] Relevant descrepancies between Sinusoidal and Homolosine
Even Rouault
even.rouault at spatialys.com
Tue Mar 10 08:22:48 PDT 2020
On mardi 10 mars 2020 14:49:37 CET Luís Moreira de Sousa wrote:
> Hi again Even, apologies for insisting. In the .ods I sent earlier you can
> verify that the Homolosine is preserving the northing-latitude identity,
> even with the ellipsoid. And also that it does not match the Sinusoidal.
>
> My guess is that the Homolosine is already spherical-spherical as it is.
Ah indeed... This P->es = 0 thing wasn't used for the instanciation of the
sinusoidal, so yes my PR was completely useless. Sorry for the noise.
So, igh preserves the identity because it does force es = 0 to the underlying
sinu... Whereas sinusoidal standalone will use an ellipsoidal formulation for
an ellipsoid.
As far as whether sinusoidal for the ellipsoidal case is correctly implemented
or not, I've no idea. I'm not sure your CSV file clearly demonstrates the loss
of the equal-area property(at least, this is not obvious to me), since it
probably compares spherical vs ellipsoidal formulations of different
projections.
Even
--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
More information about the PROJ
mailing list