[PROJ] Consistency of Proj and Esri transformations
Martin Desruisseaux
martin.desruisseaux at geomatys.com
Fri Dec 17 11:12:32 PST 2021
Hello
I think that in case of difference, neither PROJ or ESRI should be
adopted as practical reference. The cause of the difference needs to be
analyzed in order to see if there is a bug, which may happen sometime in
a software and sometime in another.
Many CRS are defined by national map agencies (USGS in USA I think, IGN
in France, etc.). Those agencies sometime publish example of points
transformed from an old CRS defined by the agency to a newer CRS. The
example points published by those agencies are the closest match to an
"official" reference I can think to. But we have to search for examples
provided by the agency of each country instead of having a central place
providing examples for many CRS.
Alternatively, for the convenience of a single source of points that can
be used as practical references for many CRS, the most trustable source
I'm aware of is https://gigs.iogp.org/.
Martin
Le 17/12/2021 à 18:08, Dave Knopp a écrit :
> Does anyone have pointers to systematic comparisons, evaluations, or any
> consistency efforts re: numeric consistency between Proj transformation
> results and those produced via Esri projection engine?
>
> A second question: in the case of differences, any thoughts which should
> be adopted as a practical reference?
More information about the PROJ
mailing list