[PROJ] Motion: whole code-base reformatting

[Javier Jimenez Shaw]

Would it be a good idea to use the same clang-format version as in GDAL? I
think one is 10 and the other 15.

Cheers

On Tue, 24 Jan 2023, 12:07 Even Rouault, <even.rouault at spatialys.com> wrote:

> Ah just to note that for now I've excluded the geodesic.h/c files and
> associated tests imported from GeographicLib from the reformatting (as
> well as a few third-party vendored C++ headers)
>
> Le 24/01/2023 à 12:05, Charles Karney a écrit :
> > +1
> >
> > On 1/23/23 22:55, Howard Butler wrote:
> >> +1
> >>
> >>> On Jan 23, 2023, at 4:01 PM, Alan Snow <alansnow21 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023, 3:34 PM Kurt Schwehr <schwehr at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> +1 KurtS
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 1:30 PM Even Rouault
> >>> <even.rouault at spatialys.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I guess this deserves formal PSC approval:
> >>> https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/pull/3590
> >>>
> >>> Basically this generalizes the formatting rules that have been applied
> >>> to the code added since PROJ >= 6 to the rest of the code base and adds
> >>> automation through pre-commit to apply those formatting rules at git
> >>> commit time.
> >>>
> >>> Starting with my +1
> >>>
> >>> Even
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> http://www.spatialys.com
> >>> My software is free, but my time generally not.
> > _______________________________________________
> > PROJ mailing list
> > PROJ at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
>
> --
> http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>
> _______________________________________________
> PROJ mailing list
> PROJ at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20230124/2f231b09/attachment.htm>