[PROJ] CSRS Epoch 2017.50 (NAD83)
Even Rouault
even.rouault at spatialys.com
Fri Jan 26 10:02:25 PST 2024
Hi,
interesting... It is known by ESRI as
https://spatialreference.org/ref/esri/104024/ but AFAICS, there isn't
any transformation registered in their database between this datum and
other North American datums.
There's a slide deck talking about it, where HTDP is mentionned
(https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/TOOLS/Htdp/Htdp.html) :
https://geodesy.noaa.gov/geospatial-summit/year-2019/files/martin-coordinates-moving.pptx
, but I've the feeling the message might be that Californians found HTDP
to not be faithful enough for their purpose. I dunno.. I guess our
friends from NGS could confirm or infirm.
I guess the reason for a separate datum is that part of California is
anchored on a separate tectonic plate than the rest of N.A (or even the
parts on the N.A. plate are subject to high deformation). Presumably
this will be obsoleted by the NATRF2022 when it comes into life, and
interestingly I found in
https://casetext.com/statute/california-codes/california-public-resources-code/division-8-surveying-and-mapping/chapter-3-geodetic-datums-and-the-california-spatial-reference-network/section-8852-nad83-natrf2022-or-patrf2022
that states "The official geodetic datum to which horizontal positions
and ellipsoid heights are referenced within the State of California
shall be NAD83, NATRF2022, or PATRF2022". Oh joy!
Even
Le 26/01/2024 à 18:24, Javier Jimenez Shaw via PROJ a écrit :
> Hi
>
> I discovered today that there is a datum in California called "CSRS
> Epoch 2017.50 (NAD83)"
> http://geoweb99.ucsd.edu/index.php/epoch2017/
> http://sopac-csrc.ucsd.edu/
>
> "CSRS Epoch 2017.50(NAD83) replaces the previous “CSRS Epoch 2011.00
> ITRF2005 NAD83(NSRS2007)” datum that included coordinates for 830 CSRN
> stations."
>
> I have not seen it before, so I guess there is no CRS using it in
> EPSG. (I do not find that datum in EPSG)
> How can it be used with PROJ?
>
> (Is it normal that some states use their own datum in the US? It is
> not enough with hundred of State Planes ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Javier.
>
> PS. Be careful with the acronyms:
> CRS: Coordinate Reference System
> CSRC: California Spatial Reference Center
> CSRS: California Spatial Reference System
> NAD83(CSRS): Canadian Spatial Reference System
>
> So "NAD83(CSRS)" and "CSRS (NAD83)" are not the same.
>
> .___ ._ ..._ .. . ._. .___ .. __ . _. . __.. ... .... ._ .__
>
> _______________________________________________
> PROJ mailing list
> PROJ at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20240126/2511284a/attachment.htm>
More information about the PROJ
mailing list