[PROJ] Wrong transformation in NL?

[Greg Troxel]

Javier Jimenez Shaw <j1 at jimenezshaw.com> writes:

> Even anyway answered with a bugfix.

Thanks - I saw that, but I didn't understand.

> ETRS89 now has more than 40 new members, from many European countries. The
> change is a free days old in EPSG.

I am guessing these are ETRFxx(country), and that this is mor or less
like NAD83(2011) vs NAD83(CSRSv8), an intent to produce ETRS89 that is
valid in that country, and then it becomes a standard of its own because
people repeatability of that to a greater acccuracy than how well that
country-specific ETRF realizes ETRS89.    But still - are there ensemble
members that are 1m different?

> Yes, the 40m difference is the geoid height in Europe.

So was the bug confusing orthometric and ellipsoidal?  It seems it was
about preference for transforms that were all sort of ok.