From willtemperley at gmail.com Mon Nov 2 02:30:27 2026 From: willtemperley at gmail.com (William Temperley) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 18:30:27 +0800 Subject: [PROJ] LLMs are killing this community In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: To foster human engagement, perhaps PROJ could make itself conceptually more accessible? There could be a PROJ blog for example. I think there are a number of articles just begging to be written, such as "Austrailia isn't where you last put it". Apart from being foundational, PROJ is really interesting, dealing with natural phenomena like plate movement and the Glacial Isostatic Adjustment. Best, Will Temperley On Sat, 31 Oct 2026 at 17:50, Javier Jimenez Shaw via PROJ wrote: > > (email sent to GDAL and PROJ mailing lists. Yes, this is inconvenient, because each one will answer in their own one). > > Yes, it is happening. > > You probably noticed it. If not, just go to the archive https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/ and see how many messages were one year ago. > > People is asking LLMs and not asking the community. We are sharing less. Each one (or at least a significant number) is being more in their silo... isolated. And that is not the way to make a community. To keep it alive. > > It is a problem, because the community is what drives and maintain these products. > > PROJ is more than 40 years old. GDAL more than 25. One key property of these products is its stability. We don't need quick development to compete in a capitalistic market. We don't play in that league. We don't need LLMs everywhere. > > We are losing maintainers, and the remaining ones are not extremely motivated. That is like cancer for these projects. > > So next time, instead of going blindly to your preferred LLM to ask something, come here, ask real humans, and help to keep this alive. Other people (including me) will read the answers and learn new things. > > Also before doing a PR ask here (this is nothing new) to see if it makes sense, if there is somebody else with the same problem/idea, to see if there is a better option. > > Enjoy talking with real humans. Even if you don't like to interact directly with people, you want them to be there. Contribute to keep this community alive. > > People is complaining that young people and children is only using social media, and not interacting with real humans face to face. This is the same, or worse. LLMs are killing our communities, and we cannot wait. > > Cheers > Javier. > _______________________________________________ > PROJ mailing list > PROJ at lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj From willtemperley at gmail.com Mon Nov 2 02:44:14 2026 From: willtemperley at gmail.com (William Temperley) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 18:44:14 +0800 Subject: [PROJ] LLMs are killing this community In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Though perhaps I should have run that reply through an LLM to correct my mispelling of Australia, which is now indelibly recorded here. This is I suspect something people don't like about public, searchable mailing lists. W On Mon, 2 Nov 2026 at 18:30, William Temperley wrote: > > To foster human engagement, perhaps PROJ could make itself > conceptually more accessible? > > There could be a PROJ blog for example. I think there are a number of > articles just begging to be written, such as "Austrailia isn't where > you last put it". > > Apart from being foundational, PROJ is really interesting, dealing > with natural phenomena like plate movement and the Glacial Isostatic > Adjustment. > > Best, > > Will Temperley > > On Sat, 31 Oct 2026 at 17:50, Javier Jimenez Shaw via PROJ > wrote: > > > > (email sent to GDAL and PROJ mailing lists. Yes, this is inconvenient, because each one will answer in their own one). > > > > Yes, it is happening. > > > > You probably noticed it. If not, just go to the archive https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/ and see how many messages were one year ago. > > > > People is asking LLMs and not asking the community. We are sharing less. Each one (or at least a significant number) is being more in their silo... isolated. And that is not the way to make a community. To keep it alive. > > > > It is a problem, because the community is what drives and maintain these products. > > > > PROJ is more than 40 years old. GDAL more than 25. One key property of these products is its stability. We don't need quick development to compete in a capitalistic market. We don't play in that league. We don't need LLMs everywhere. > > > > We are losing maintainers, and the remaining ones are not extremely motivated. That is like cancer for these projects. > > > > So next time, instead of going blindly to your preferred LLM to ask something, come here, ask real humans, and help to keep this alive. Other people (including me) will read the answers and learn new things. > > > > Also before doing a PR ask here (this is nothing new) to see if it makes sense, if there is somebody else with the same problem/idea, to see if there is a better option. > > > > Enjoy talking with real humans. Even if you don't like to interact directly with people, you want them to be there. Contribute to keep this community alive. > > > > People is complaining that young people and children is only using social media, and not interacting with real humans face to face. This is the same, or worse. LLMs are killing our communities, and we cannot wait. > > > > Cheers > > Javier. > > _______________________________________________ > > PROJ mailing list > > PROJ at lists.osgeo.org > > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj From lnicola at dend.ro Mon Nov 2 02:46:17 2026 From: lnicola at dend.ro (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauren=C8=9Biu_Nicola?=) Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2026 12:46:17 +0200 Subject: [PROJ] LLMs are killing this community In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, Nov 2, 2026, at 12:44, William Temperley via PROJ wrote: > Though perhaps I should have run that reply through an LLM to correct > my mispelling of Australia, which is now indelibly recorded here. > > This is I suspect something people don't like about public, searchable > mailing lists. And your misspelling of misspelling too. Still reads better than an LLM message, don't worry about it :-). Laurentiu From j1 at jimenezshaw.com Tue Nov 3 10:27:42 2026 From: j1 at jimenezshaw.com (Javier Jimenez Shaw) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 19:27:42 +0100 Subject: [PROJ] NAD83(2011) to NATRF2022 + NAPGD2022 Message-ID: Hi I have problems with that particular operation for the Modernized NSRS NAD83(2011) to NATRF2022 + NAPGD2022 NGS recently published the NADCON5 (or 6) grid files from NAD83(2011) to NATRF2022 They are in my NSRS-2022-PROJ project. The changes I am doing are in this branch: https://github.com/jjimenezshaw/NSRS-2022-PROJ/tree/nad83-to-natrf-napgd The problem comes from "ITRF2020 to NAD83(2011) (1)" and that NAPGD2022 is interpolated in ITRF2020. So PROJ is going from NAD83(2011) to ITRF2020, apply the geoid model, and then from ITRF2020 to NATRF2022... ignoring the NADCON5 file. That is wrong. Trying to fix it I made a concatenated operation from "NATRF2022 to NAPGD2022", but it is not fixing it. However, if I define explicitly "NATRF2022 to NAPGD2022" (not a concatenated operation but an entry in the table grid_transformation) it works. What is the difference between the explicit transformation and the concatenated operation? If you need help to reproduce it, ask me directly. Otherwise this email would be too long. Note 1: NAD83(2011) to NATRF2022 (ellipsoidal) is working fine (no surprise) Note 2: if the transformation is from NAD83(2011)+NAVD88 height, it is working fine. The problem is apparently only from the 3D system. Thank you Javier. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lnicola at dend.ro Wed Nov 4 00:18:58 2026 From: lnicola at dend.ro (=?UTF-8?Q?Lauren=C8=9Biu_Nicola?=) Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 10:18:58 +0200 Subject: [PROJ] New GitHub setting for Copilot reviews Message-ID: <6437b75b-e49b-420e-925c-44792e2ce6cf@app.fastmail.com> Hello, Just a quick FYI, GitHub has a new option under Copilot / Code review / "Block reviews requested with an external Copilot license". Any project that not appreciate LLM usage might want to enable it. (cross-posted to GDAL/PROJ/QGIS) Laurentiu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From even.rouault at spatialys.com Wed Nov 4 03:40:06 2026 From: even.rouault at spatialys.com (Even Rouault) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 12:40:06 +0100 Subject: [PROJ] Stepping out from PROJ PSC Message-ID: Hi, I'm stepping out from my position of member of the PROJ PSC. I wish the project all the best for its future. I will only look from a distance but happy to try helping in case it would be needed. Best regards, Even -- http://www.spatialys.com My software is free, but my time generally not. LLMs contribute to global warming and brain rot. Let's guillotine them! "Ah ! ?a ira, ?a ira, ?a ira !" Initiator of https://fuckaifoundation.org From Jochem.Lesparre at kadaster.nl Wed Nov 4 04:18:48 2026 From: Jochem.Lesparre at kadaster.nl (Lesparre, Jochem) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 12:18:48 +0000 Subject: [PROJ] Stepping out from PROJ PSC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Even, It makes me sad to see you leave. Thanks for everything you have done for PROJ. I wish you the best. Regards, Jochem -----Original Message----- From: PROJ On Behalf Of Even Rouault via PROJ Sent: woensdag 4 november 2026 12:40 To: proj Subject: [PROJ] Stepping out from PROJ PSC Hi, I'm stepping out from my position of member of the PROJ PSC. I wish the project all the best for its future. I will only look from a distance but happy to try helping in case it would be needed. Best regards, Even -- http://www.spatialys.com/ My software is free, but my time generally not. LLMs contribute to global warming and brain rot. Let's guillotine them! "Ah ! ?a ira, ?a ira, ?a ira !" Initiator of https://fuckaifoundation.org/ _______________________________________________ PROJ mailing list PROJ at lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj Disclaimer: De inhoud van deze e-mail is vertrouwelijk en uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n). Gebruik, openbaarmaking, vermenigvuldiging, verspreiding en/of verstrekking van deze informatie aan derden is niet toegestaan. Op al onze producten en diensten zijn onze algemene leveringsvoorwaarden van toepassing [https://www.kadaster.nl/algemene-leveringsvoorwaarden]. Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Our general terms and conditions of delivery apply to all our products and services [https://www.kadaster.com/general-terms-and-conditions]. From kristian at evers.dev Wed Nov 4 04:40:29 2026 From: kristian at evers.dev (Kristian Evers) Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 12:40:29 +0000 Subject: [PROJ] Stepping out from PROJ PSC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Even, That saddens me terribly. You are an invaluable asset for the project, the open source geospatial community and in recent years also the geodetic community. I hope we see you around from time to time! All the best, Kristian On Wednesday, November 4th, 2026 at 13:10, Even Rouault via PROJ wrote: > Hi, > > I'm stepping out from my position of member of the PROJ PSC. I wish the > project all the best for its future. I will only look from a distance > but happy to try helping in case it would be needed. > > Best regards, > > Even > > -- > http://www.spatialys.com > My software is free, but my time generally not. > LLMs contribute to global warming and brain rot. > Let's guillotine them! "Ah ! ?a ira, ?a ira, ?a ira !" > Initiator of https://fuckaifoundation.org > > _______________________________________________ > PROJ mailing list > PROJ at lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj > From alansnow21 at gmail.com Wed Nov 4 05:26:23 2026 From: alansnow21 at gmail.com (Alan Snow) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 07:26:23 -0600 Subject: [PROJ] Stepping out from PROJ PSC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: +1 Alan (seconding what Kristian said) - Sad day for the open source geospatial community. Thank you for the wonderful contributions that you have made. On Wed, Nov 4, 2026, 6:50?AM Kristian Evers via PROJ wrote: > Even, > > That saddens me terribly. You are an invaluable asset for the project, the > open source geospatial community and in recent years also the geodetic > community. I hope we see you around from time to time! > > All the best, > Kristian > > > > On Wednesday, November 4th, 2026 at 13:10, Even Rouault via PROJ < > proj at lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm stepping out from my position of member of the PROJ PSC. I wish the > > project all the best for its future. I will only look from a distance > > but happy to try helping in case it would be needed. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Even > > > > -- > > http://www.spatialys.com > > My software is free, but my time generally not. > > LLMs contribute to global warming and brain rot. > > Let's guillotine them! "Ah ! ?a ira, ?a ira, ?a ira !" > > Initiator of https://fuckaifoundation.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > PROJ mailing list > > PROJ at lists.osgeo.org > > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj > > > _______________________________________________ > PROJ mailing list > PROJ at lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: