[PROJ] More restrictive LLM policy - like in GDAL

[Nyall Dawson]

On Fri, 16 Oct 2026, 3:45 am Javier Jimenez Shaw via PROJ, <
proj at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> Hi
>
>
>
> I created this PR that is a copy of the GDAL AI policy:
> https://gdal.org/en/stable/community/ai_tool_policy.html
>

Thanks for taking this on, and for taking this initiative!

My 2c is that the gdal policy isn't restrictive enough. The gdal community
is still hurting and maybe on life support now.

I'd argue for a more restrictive policy to begin with , with the potential
for loosening this down the track if desired. (For reference, qgis is
currently strictly "no AI", with the onus on interested parties to argue
the case for loosening this policy).

Nyall


> I don't know if it will keep slope code out of PROJ, but it is another
> step.
> https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/pull/4912
>
> Cheers
> Javier.
> _______________________________________________
> PROJ mailing list
> PROJ at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20261016/b1cb1e31/attachment.htm>