[pygeoapi] PSC vote: RFC3: Architectural Decision Records

[Tom Kralidis]

+1

..Tom

On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 9:12 AM Jorge S. Mendes de Jesus via pygeoapi <
pygeoapi at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> Hereby my vote: +1
>
> See you in Evora.....lets see what the bones have to say....
>
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 at 14:59, Francesco Bartoli via pygeoapi <
> pygeoapi at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all: I've drafted a new RFC
>> https://github.com/geopython/pygeoapi.io/blob/master/docs/development/rfc/3.md and
>> I'm looking for your consensus to adopt this methodology as best practice
>> in the development process.
>>
>> Please let me know your thoughts, I'm available anytime before the code
>> sprint to discuss and review any comment or amendment.
>>
>> I'm starting the voting process with my +1.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Francesco
>> _______________________________________________
>> pygeoapi mailing list
>> pygeoapi at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pygeoapi
>>
>
>
> --
> OpenPGP Key: 0x7212572C
> _______________________________________________
> pygeoapi mailing list
> pygeoapi at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pygeoapi
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pygeoapi/attachments/20240218/c45fb8de/attachment.htm>