[pygeoapi] for review: RFC4 - GitHub Issue and Pull Request management

[Tom Kralidis]

Thanks Ricardo, formatting fixed :)

..Tom


On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 7:11 PM Ricardo Filipe Soares Garcia da via pygeoapi
<pygeoapi at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> Seems good to me, apart from a minor formatting issue with the last two
> items on the 'Implementation' section, which I guess would be indented as
> sub-items.
>
> Tom Kralidis via pygeoapi <pygeoapi at lists.osgeo.org> escreveu (domingo,
> 3/03/2024 à(s) 22:03):
>
>> Hi all: as discussed last week, please find RFC4 [1] for review and
>> discussion. If/once we update as needed, I will put to a PSC vote for
>> formal approval later this week.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> ..Tom
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] https://pygeoapi.io/development/rfc/4
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pygeoapi mailing list
>> pygeoapi at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pygeoapi
>>
>
>
> --
> ___________________________ ___ __
> Ricardo Garcia Silva
> _______________________________________________
> pygeoapi mailing list
> pygeoapi at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pygeoapi
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pygeoapi/attachments/20240304/dcc89bbc/attachment.htm>