[Pywps-dev] Complex and Literal Validators

[Jachym Cepicky]

Hi, sorry /me at company's code sprint, takes longer to switch the focus

As Jorge writes, I tried to follow the principle we introduced for
ComplexData (as described by Jorge). You have to make sure, the string is
at least number/date/string/time/..... so you have to validate. Although 4
validation steps are a bit overkill (Simple to Strict would be ok)

Same applies for BBOX. I think checking e.g. whether the avalues are
between -90, 90 and -180, 180 for WGS84 makes sense

J

st 15. 4. 2015 v 16:48 odesílatel Luís de Sousa <luis.a.de.sousa at gmail.com>
napsal:

> Thanks for replying Jorge. Quite frankly I do not remember what was
> decided on this last year, but what you wrote makes all the sense.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Luís
>
> On 14 April 2015 at 17:18, Jorge Samuel Mendes de Jesus
> <jorge.mendesdejesus at wur.nl> wrote:
> > Hi to all
> >
> > This sort of validation was decided in a meeting in Lux, the data
> > validation is more or less a schema content validation and/or image
> > mimetype, I think the default option was NONE (Jachym?, Luis?)
> >
> > According to the level of validation, PyWPS has to raise an
> > invalidParameterValue
> >
> > For example
> > in SIMPLE:
> > XML OK  --> No error
> >
> > STRICT:
> > XML OK + OK Schema validation -->No error
> >
> > STRICT:
> > XML OK + BAD Schema validation -->InvalidParameterValue
> >
> > VERYSTRICT:
> > XML OK + OK Schema validation+ UTF etc etc --> No error
> >
> > Jorge
> >
> > On 14-04-15 14:40, Calin Ciociu wrote:
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >>
> >> Validators are currently not being used and there are 4 different modes:
> >>
> >> * NONE
> >> * SIMPLE
> >> * STRICT
> >> * VERYSTRICT
> >>
> >> So I was wondering how exactly does the data have to be validated?
> >>
> >> Which mode should be used when?
> >>
> >> As far as I understood the data is supposed to be validated after
> >> fetching the data.
> >>
> >> Should PyWPS raise an InvalidParameterValue if the data cant be
> >> validated?
> >>
> >>
> >> Calin
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> pywps-dev mailing list
> >> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
> >
> > --
> > ISRIC - World Soil Information
> > Post: PO box 353, 6700 AJ, Wageningen,
> > The Netherlands Visiting Address: Droevendaalsesteeg 3, 6708 PB
> > Wageningen (Bdg. 101),
> > Office: C.013
> > Office Phone: +31 (0) 317 4 83715
> > Mobile Phone: +31 (0) 613 9 06950
> > OpenPGPKey: 0xA3D0065A
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pywps-dev mailing list
> > pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
> _______________________________________________
> pywps-dev mailing list
> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pywps-dev/attachments/20150416/69e70f8c/attachment.html>