[Pywps-dev] [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter incubation (fwd)

[Tom Kralidis]

Sounds like PyWPS = PyWPS 3, then.

I think Jachym as the main contact can update incom. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 16, 2015, at 09:26, Luís de Sousa <luis.a.de.sousa at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Tom,
> 
> The goal is for PyWPS 4 to support WPS 2.0, support for 1.0 is nearly covered, appart from assynchronous execution.
> 
> As PyWPS 4 is still in development and not user ready, I would prefer to keep it in its own repo for now. Once we deem it ready for public release then we can think of merging the repos.
> 
> How can the InCom be contacted? Or is it something Jachym can do?
> 
> Luis
> 
>> On 16 Apr 2015 15:13, "Tom Kralidis" <tomkralidis at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks Luis.  Can someone clarify this to InCom, then?
>> 
>> I'm wondering whether PyWPS 3 / 4 should be in the same repository, with
>> 3 being master and 4 being a branch? This way the project is logically
>> consistent ('PyWPS').
>> 
>> Will PyWPS 4 support WPS 1.0.0?
>> 
>> On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Luís de Sousa wrote:
>> 
>>> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 22:02:33 +0200
>>> From: Luís de Sousa <luis.a.de.sousa at gmail.com>
>>> To: Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
>>> Cc: "pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org" <pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Pywps-dev] [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter incubation (fwd)
>>> 
>>> Hi Tom,
>>> 
>>> These two versions are part of a same project.  Version 4 is a major
>>> step forward from version 3, but the underlying concept is the same.
>>> 
>>> More than a re-write, PyWPS-4 is intended to deliver WPS 2.0 compliance.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Luís
>>> 
>>>> On 9 April 2015 at 13:54, Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi all: FYI per below for clarification as we move forward with OSGeo
>>>> incubation.
>>>> 
>>>> Can someone response to Dimitris' question?
>>>> 
>>>> ..Tom
>>>> 
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 03:58:09 +0200 (CEST)
>>>> From: Dimitris Kotzinos <kotzino at gmail.com>
>>>> To: incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter incubation
>>>> 
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> no objection in general and the project is within OSGEO scope and has been
>>>> around for quite a long time. But I would like to ask for a clarification
>>>> before voting: what is the relation between PyWPS-3 and PyWPS-4 and since
>>>> the second is written from scratch do we accept both for incubation? And if
>>>> so as one project?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks in advance for clarifying this,
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Dimitris
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Incubator mailing list
>>>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> pywps-dev mailing list
>>>> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pywps-dev/attachments/20150417/f0cb9c5e/attachment.html>