[Pywps-dev] [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter incubation (fwd)

[Jachym Cepicky]

I just say: thank you for keeping this warm.

I'm all for your proposals. Will start the wiki a bit.

J

P.S. Sorry for long response times from myself - this spring is somehow fast

čt 23. 4. 2015 v 15:39 odesílatel Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
napsal:

>
> Thanks Jachym.  I've updated InCom and passed the motion for Board
> approval.
> I've also filed a ticket to add PyWPS to the Incubating Projects list [1].
>
> I think the next logical step here is to start tackling the project
> graduation
> checklist [2], and suggest we use the PyWPS GitHub Wiki as the area to
> manage
> the chceklist [3].
>
> Using pycsw as a recent example, [4] provides a proposal on how we tracked
> and
> managed the entire incubation process.  What do folks think?
>
> Cheers
>
> ..Tom
>
> [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1488
> [2]
> http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/project_graduation_checklist.html
> [3] https://github.com/geopython/PyWPS/wiki
> [4] https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/wiki/OSGeo-Incubation
>
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:47:30 +0000
> > From: Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>
> > To: Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>,
> >     Luís de Sousa <luis.a.de.sousa at gmail.com>
> > Cc: "pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org" <pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Pywps-dev] [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter incubation
> (fwd)
> >
> > As Luis is writing and Tom concluding: PyWPS currently  == PyWPS 3
> >
> > The repositories are keeped seperated, to point out, "this is something
> > completely new, new philosophy, code base, license". Once is baked (at
> > least support for WPS 1:0.0), I would like to move it to geopython
> project
> >
> > J
> >
> > pá 17. 4. 2015 v 14:16 odesílatel Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
> > napsal:
> >
> >> Sounds like PyWPS = PyWPS 3, then.
> >>
> >> I think Jachym as the main contact can update incom.
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >> On Apr 16, 2015, at 09:26, Luís de Sousa <luis.a.de.sousa at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >> The goal is for PyWPS 4 to support WPS 2.0, support for 1.0 is nearly
> >> covered, appart from assynchronous execution.
> >>
> >> As PyWPS 4 is still in development and not user ready, I would prefer to
> >> keep it in its own repo for now. Once we deem it ready for public
> release
> >> then we can think of merging the repos.
> >>
> >> How can the InCom be contacted? Or is it something Jachym can do?
> >>
> >> Luis
> >> On 16 Apr 2015 15:13, "Tom Kralidis" <tomkralidis at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks Luis.  Can someone clarify this to InCom, then?
> >>>
> >>> I'm wondering whether PyWPS 3 / 4 should be in the same repository,
> with
> >>> 3 being master and 4 being a branch? This way the project is logically
> >>> consistent ('PyWPS').
> >>>
> >>> Will PyWPS 4 support WPS 1.0.0?
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Luís de Sousa wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 22:02:33 +0200
> >>>> From: Luís de Sousa <luis.a.de.sousa at gmail.com>
> >>>> To: Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
> >>>> Cc: "pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org" <pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
> >>>> Subject: Re: [Pywps-dev] [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter
> incubation
> >>>> (fwd)
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Tom,
> >>>>
> >>>> These two versions are part of a same project.  Version 4 is a major
> >>>> step forward from version 3, but the underlying concept is the same.
> >>>>
> >>>> More than a re-write, PyWPS-4 is intended to deliver WPS 2.0
> compliance.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>> Luís
> >>>>
> >>>> On 9 April 2015 at 13:54, Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi all: FYI per below for clarification as we move forward with OSGeo
> >>>>> incubation.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can someone response to Dimitris' question?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ..Tom
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 03:58:09 +0200 (CEST)
> >>>>> From: Dimitris Kotzinos <kotzino at gmail.com>
> >>>>> To: incubator at lists.osgeo.org
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter incubation
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> no objection in general and the project is within OSGEO scope and has
> >>>>> been
> >>>>> around for quite a long time. But I would like to ask for a
> >>>>> clarification
> >>>>> before voting: what is the relation between PyWPS-3 and PyWPS-4 and
> >>>>> since
> >>>>> the second is written from scratch do we accept both for incubation?
> >>>>> And if
> >>>>> so as one project?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks in advance for clarifying this,
> >>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dimitris
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Incubator mailing list
> >>>>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
> >>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> pywps-dev mailing list
> >>>>> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>  _______________________________________________
> >> pywps-dev mailing list
> >> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pywps-dev/attachments/20150423/0f280131/attachment.html>