[Pywps-dev] [REST] Multiple running server

[Calin Ciociu]

I can look into changing so all the PyWPS instances run only on 1 flask 
instance with 1 port only.
Then use like Jonas said .../wps1 and .../wps2 in combination with that 
port.

Is this desired?
Otherwise I will leave it as it is for the moment.

I changed the default REST url to .../wpsadmin which can be configured 
in the PyWPS configuration file under the section [server].
Just modify the RESTPath attribute value. (has to start with a leading 
slash).

Best regards,
Calin

On 23.07.15 09:19, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
> Jonas: I believe, this is just flask issue, on apache this should work 
> as expected (flask can handle only singe request per time)
>
> flask should not be used in production environment [1] -> Do not use 
> the builtin development server in production.
>
> [1] http://flask.pocoo.org/docs/0.10/deploying/
>
> st 22. 7. 2015 v 14:24 odesílatel Jonas Eberle <jonas.eberle at gmx.de 
> <mailto:jonas.eberle at gmx.de>> napsal:
>
>     Hi Calin,
>
>     do you also have in mind to publish several PyWPS instances on a
>     single port? For operational use I am not keen on opening a new
>     port for any PyWPS instance in the future. I would like to use
>     WSGI with Apache Webserver to make my instances available. Will
>     this still be available with these developments?
>
>     I would like to organize my services as follows (path to
>     configured in the settings or in the Apache configuration):
>     http://localhost/wps1
>     http://localhost/wps2
>
>     For the REST administration interface I would then like to use,
>     e.g. http://localhost/wpsadmin (path to be configured in settings
>     or Apache configuration).
>
>     Best regards,
>     Jonas
>
>     ----- Am 21. Jul 2015 um 17:23 schrieb Calin Ciociu
>     <calin.ciociu at gmail.com <mailto:calin.ciociu at gmail.com>>:
>
>         Hello everyone,
>
>         I wanted to know people's opinion on the way I am currently
>         implementing
>         the REST interface.
>         Multiple server can be run and managed through the REST interface
>         although every server runs with a different port.
>         So in the end there will be multiple servers running like for
>         example:
>
>         http://localhost:5001/wps...
>         http://localhost:5002/wps...
>         http://localhost:5003/wps...
>
>         On top of these a "sever" is already running which is handling
>         REST.
>         It is currently running on port 5000 (which can be also changed).
>
>         To me this makes sense and seems straightforward.
>         Is there a better approach?
>         Should I continue like this?
>
>
>         Best regards,
>
>         Calin
>         _______________________________________________
>         pywps-dev mailing list
>         pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>         http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     pywps-dev mailing list
>     pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>     http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pywps-dev mailing list
> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pywps-dev/attachments/20150809/575fe702/attachment.html>