[Pywps-dev] OSGeo incubation update

[Tom Kralidis]

Hi Jachym: for demo.pywps.org I've added you to the telascience group
so you'll be able to ssh into demo.pywps.org.

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> as you are writing. I have the "contributors" task on my todo list as well
> as demo.pywps.org
>
> I need access to the server and I do not have it. I believe, you could help
> me with access to it - could you, please?
>
> Once PyWPS 4.0 is out, we shall boost the incubation too
>
> Thanks
>
> J
>
> čt 1. 9. 2016 v 14:29 odesílatel Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
> napsal:
>>
>> Hi all: great to see so much action around PyWPS in the
>> last weeks -- great work all!
>>
>> I'd like to provide an update on our OSGeo incubation [1] path
>> and way forward.  We've made great strides:
>>
>> - including inclusion into OSGeo-Live, which will yield significant
>> benefits over time especially as we move to PyWPS 4.0
>> - we have a PSC and an RFC framework
>> - we are moving towards OGC compliance with http://demo.pywps.org as a
>> deployed instance; this will also put us in a great position to make PyWPS
>> an official OGC Reference Implementation
>>
>> A full list of OSGeo incubation related progress is available at [2].
>>
>> Having said this, I think we are close to proposing PyWPS becoming an
>> OSGeo project with remaining tasks in [3], namely:
>>
>> - code provenance review [4], we need a scan of all Python files to
>> ensure (using 3.2.5)
>> - project graduation checklist; I've started a draft in [5] which needs
>> input and polishing off
>> - contributor and license agreements [6]; we've done a good job
>> at capturing most CLAs here.  I think this is good enough for moving
>> ahead at this point
>> - clarify contributors: once we discuss/decide copyright transfer (or not)
>> we can call this done
>>
>> Once the above items are in good order I'd like to propose PyWPS
>> for graduation.  The meat of the work here is the code provenance.  IMHO
>> I think a 1 hour sprint on IRC can help move this item into completion.
>>
>> Comments/thoughts/suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> ..Tom
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/geopython/pywps/wiki/OSGeoIncubation
>> [2]
>> https://github.com/geopython/pywps/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20label%3A%22OSGeo%20Incubation%22%20
>> [3]
>> https://github.com/geopython/pywps/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue%20is%3Aopen%20label%3A%22OSGeo%20Incubation%22%20
>> [4] https://github.com/geopython/pywps/issues/130
>> [5] https://github.com/geopython/pywps/wiki/ProjectGraduationChecklist
>> [6] https://github.com/geopython/pywps/issues/124
>> [7] https://github.com/geopython/pywps/issues/84
>> _______________________________________________
>> pywps-dev mailing list
>> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev