[Qgis-community-team] 2.18 LTR Documentation

[Alexandre Neto]

20h (probably 21h) for me it's impossible to participate. That is
dinner+bath+ bed time for kids :)

Alexandre

DelazJ <delazj at gmail.com> escreveu no dia segunda, 5/06/2017 às 15:27:

> Hi Paolo,
>
> I'm sorry but I'm not sure I could tonight. I'd be on the road at that
> time and if I arrive earlier and have connection, why not?
> Otherwise, if Yves or Alexandre can't attend, at least Richard and you
> could bring the voice of the documentation to the PSC, based on my draft...
>
> Thanks,
> H.
>
>
> 2017-06-05 9:00 GMT+02:00 Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>:
>
>> Il 04/06/2017 20:36, DelazJ ha scritto:
>>
>> > A month later, could be nice to revive this thread and discuss ideas to
>> > improve QGIS Docs...
>> > Some of the top topics imho could be :
>> > - release of 2.18 docs:  If I'm not wrong, the May release was supposed
>> > to be the new LTR then I guess, given issues that occurred, the LTR
>> > release will be June's. Are we ready? Status of remaining issues/PR?
>> > - QGIS3 and link to online documentation (aka the new help system): how
>> > could we ensure the best experience to the users? Collaboration with dev
>> > team?
>> > - Strategy to have the documentation budget always used each year,
>> > because QGIS documentation has needs and projects (right?).
>> >
>> > I've listed some items that I have in mind and somehow appear to me like
>> > issues or questions to answer. They are referenced in a wiki page of my
>> > repository
>> > (https://github.com/DelazJ/QGIS-Documentation/wiki/On-the-road-to-QGIS3
>> > <https://github.com/DelazJ/QGIS-Documentation/wiki/On-the-road-to-QGIS3
>> >
>> > - a kind of quick cheat sheet). If valuable, we can use it as a basis
>> > and improve/clean it and produce a more structured and shared doc, maybe
>> > in the QGIS Doc wiki (I don't really know what is its current status -
>> > could we put things on it?).
>> > The main idea would be to come up with plans, strategy or call it the
>> > way you want we could submit to PSC and dev list (our priorities, what
>> > we do need help for?...). Another option could be to discuss directly
>> > the points in (one of?) those lists but I'm afraid, we miss the
>> > prioritization step :(
>>
>> Hi Harrissou,
>> I agree, these are important issues.
>> Maybe we can talk about this during next PSC, this evening h 20? You are
>> welcome to join.
>> All the best.
>> --
>> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
>> QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
>> https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-community-team mailing list for organizing community resources such
>> as documentation, translation etc..
>> Qgis-community-team at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-community-team
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-community-team mailing list for organizing community resources such
> as documentation, translation etc..
> Qgis-community-team at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-community-team

-- 
Alexandre Neto
---------------------
@AlexNetoGeo
http://sigsemgrilhetas.wordpress.com
http://gisunchained.wordpress.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-community-team/attachments/20170605/6c302b65/attachment.html>