[Qgis-developer] [POLL] STL vs. Qt containers

[Martin Dobias]

On 10/29/06, Tim Sutton <tim at linfiniti.com> wrote:
> +1 For me - we should strive to make our api as consistent with Qt as
> possible - it will make it easy for users with Qt knowledge to get to grips
> with our code base.
>
> What abut deque etc that you currently use for canvas layers?

For this case QStringList I think is best suited.
In the refactoring branch I've dumped the usage of QgsMapLayerSet and
there's already overriden member QgsMapRender::setLayerSet(QStringList
layers) for convenience (added because I haven't managed yet to
convert between deque and python lists).

Martin

>
> Tim
>
>
>
> On 27/10/2006, at 21:36, Martin Dobias wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> it seems that there are different opinions on which containers to
> prefer, thus I would like to do a poll about this.
>
> Please vote as follows what containers should be used in QGIS code:
> +2 ... use only Qt containers
> +1 ... use Qt containers for public API, allowing STL containers elsewhere
> 0 ... don't know / indifferent
> -1 ... use STL containers for public API, allowing Qt containers elsewhere
> -2 ... use only STL containers
>
> (as public API I mean classes in core and gui libraries)
>
>
> From this poll I hope we will be able to create a coding standard for QGIS.
>
> +1 for me.
>
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.qgis.org
> http://lists.qgis.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
> --
> Tim Sutton
>
> Visit http://qgis.org for a great Open Source GIS
> Home Page: http://linfiniti.com
> Skype: timlinux
> MSN: tim_bdworld at msn.com
> Yahoo: tim_bdworld at yahoo.com
> Jabber: timlinux
> Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
>
>
>
>