Jürgen E. Fischer
jef at norbit.de
Thu Aug 13 07:15:40 EDT 2009
On Thu, 13. Aug 2009 at 10:29:03 +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Hugentobler Marco ha scritto:
> > My personal opinion: I think it is better to include those new features
> > into 1.3 for stability reasons (that's the purpose of feature freeze after
> > all).
> Of course, if you think there is a risk of instability, better to postpone it. I
> suggested it because they do not seemed invasive.
#62 might be very invasive. Previously there was not explicit type for feature
ids and therefore we might find a lot of places where there are ints now, which
are feature ids, but were not touched because they were not yet identified as
such. That's a potential source for breakages.
The others IMHO are harmless. If we weren't in feature freeze, I would have
applied them already. But they aren't too important either, so I don't see a
urgent need for lifting the feature freeze just for those.
Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-20
Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13 Fax. +49-4931-918175-50
Software Engineer D-26506 Norden http://www.norbit.de
norBIT Gesellschaft fuer Unternehmensberatung und Informationssysteme mbH
Rheinstrasse 13, 26506 Norden
GF: Jelto Buurman, HR: Amtsgericht Emden, HRB 5502
More information about the Qgis-developer