[Qgis-developer] [Fwd: Re: [Qgis-user] Poll on website]

[Maxim Dubinin]

+1 again on leaving only 1.1, we're having not 2 but 3 versions
of QGIS "stable", "unstable" and "even more unstable", this is
confusing.

But please also check Tim's comments [1] on this issue raised sometime
ago, they are valid.

Maxim

[1]http://n2.nabble.com/QGIS-1.0.3-is-next...-td2886563.html#a2886563

Вы писали 15 июля 2009 г., 0:22:59:

PC> Hi all.
PC> What about dropping 1.0.2 line, and concentrating on 1.1.x, and soon on 1.2?
PC> My arguments:
PC> - most people use 1.1 or trunk (see the poll)
PC> - 1.0.2 is not more stable than 1.1
PC> - we do not seem to have the human resource to backport systematically
PC> the many fixes we have in 1.1 (often, not even those in trunk)
PC> - the current situation is quite confusing for necomers (and probably
PC> also for many other users); see e.g.
PC> http://qgis.org/en/download/binaries.html
PC> All the best.

PC> -------- Messaggio Originale  --------
PC> Oggetto: Re: [Qgis-user] Poll on website
PC> Data: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:52:38 -0700

PC> Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>> Yes, this is also my experience. Furthermore, I do not find 1.0.x
>> particularly more stable than 1.1.x (do you?).
>> All the best.
>>   

PC> Try opening a previously saved QGS file with a WMS layer and no internet
PC> connection with 1.0.x .. crash! This means I can't really use QGIS 1.0.x
PC> when traveling or if the internet is down. Nonetheless, I do my main
PC> work with the "stable" 1.0.x series since I work with other people .. we
PC> keep our versions the same for obvious reasons.

PC> Versions 1.1.x and beyond are more stable with this particular matter.
PC> Details: http://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/1739

PC> -Mike