[Qgis-developer] 1.1 and 1.0.1 Release plans & feature freeze

Martin Dobias wonder.sk at gmail.com
Sat May 9 10:51:54 EDT 2009


On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Carson Farmer <carson.farmer at gmail.com> wrote:
> Otto et al.,
>
> I very much like this idea. Some of my own thoughts:
>
> Another possible set of tags: [NEW FEATURE], [BUG FIX], or [UPDATE].
>
> That way the developer doesn't have to decide on their own if the change
> need to be added to the manual. Manual writers can simply decide if the NEW
> FEATURE needs to be added or not... I also think that NEW FEATURE is more
> intuitive for developers than MANUAL which is likely not something they are
> thinking about at the time...

[Manual] seems to me too broad term. On the other hand, is there any
need for [bug fix] tag? Usually it's clear from the commit message :-)
I would vote for [FEATURE] and [UPDATE]. But still I'm not sure what
should be considered as an update... (any thoughts of examples what is
and what is not an update?)

Anyway, it will probably need some time to get used to any tagging...
developers are lazy, otherwise they wouldn't have became developers
:-)

Martin


More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list