[Qgis-developer] Way forward: QGIS plugin repo, plugin Trac etc.
pi_ml at sourcepole.com
Tue Nov 16 04:39:49 EST 2010
Am Montag, 15. November 2010, um 22.23:59 schrieb Borys Jurgiel:
> > So change of mind from our discussion on IRC yesterday? Should Pirmin
> > and I still bother with the test install of Redmine?
> Actually I'm still a bit confused and don't want to take one of the two
> sides (mainly because I only looked briefly at the Redmine), but let's
> just write down the disadvantages and threats of the two solutions.
In my opinion it's not a discussion between Django and Redmine. The confusion
comes from not discussing all aspects in one session (yes, people were too
I would group the aspects in
1. Package repository + Package download website
2. Plugin source code repository
3. Bug tracking + Plugin home pages
Borys and Martin proposed a solution for point 1, developed with Django. They
did not couple the package repository with the source code repository to let
plugin developers choose their SCM.
Tim's announcement includes the following solutions for these aspects:
1. Django application
2. One(?) Github repository
3. One(?) Trac instance
In the discussion Alex is referring to, we came to this:
1. not discussed
2. OSGeo Git server
We didn't go deeper into point 2 and number 3 was not confirmed by Tim.
I have absolutely no problems with Tim's solution and I'm sure he will clarify
open points as soon as he arrives in South Africa.
Sourcepole - Linux & Open Source Solutions
More information about the Qgis-developer