[Qgis-developer] Merging gis-newgis theme
Martin Dobias
wonder.sk at gmail.com
Sun Apr 17 19:19:55 EDT 2011
Hi Robert
We had a small poll among the last men standing this evening (Tim,
Anne, Borys, me) with the following results:
1A for consistency, but still it would be better to have icons that
actually represent printing rather than composition
2B
3 use globe on top, with a "document" in the background as with other
"load" icons
4B
5B the hand could be slightly improved
6A
7 the diskette icon is still slightly confusing, something like this
[1] has been proposed, though that might be still unclear
8,11-14A
9B but with smooth shape
10A
15B but without the action in top-bottom corner, with smooth shape
16B with smooth shape
17B but the plaster could be brigher
18B with cleaned arrow
19B but agreed that it's not clear
20B,21B if we have to keep the "no perspective" rule, let's try
something like [2]. Another idea was to use a golf flag icon [3]
22-25 it would be good to keep something like "ABC" as in 22B, using
the bottom-right actions like in 22-25A icons
Regards
Martin
[1] http://www.talendforge.org/svn/tos/tags/release-4_2_0M4/org.talend.designer.components.localprovider/components/tAccessCommit/tAccessCommit_icon32.png
[2] http://icdn.pro/images/en/b/o/bookmark-red-icone-3792-128.png
[3] http://www.nh.com/csp/cms/sites/NH/assets/images/nh/Minis/GreenGolfFlag.png
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Robert Szczepanek
<robert at szczepanek.pl> wrote:
> Hello Lisbon!
>
> I made short review of two very similar themes [1], as we decided to joint
> them. It covers only basic set (without any plugin). As base for merging I
> propose "gis" theme, as there are more plugin icons.
> Simple voting system (1B, 2B, 3A, ...) will work you think?
>
> Please add your comments Anita, if needed.
>
> regards,
> Robert
>
> [1] http://robert.szczepanek.pl/tmp/theme.png
>
> 1:
> A + consistent with next
>
> 2:
> A + one vector sign in theme (see 15)
> B + nicer (transparency)
>
> 3:
> A - too small map sign
> B - page/paper? sing
>
> 4: see 2
>
> 5:
> A - <extend view>? not <pan>
> B + consistent with cursor; recognizable
> - not sharp
>
> 6:
> B - from another theme
>
> 7:
> B - from another theme
>
> 8,11-14:
> A smooth
> B sharp
>
> 9:
> A + easy to scale as general <move> action (small sign in right
> bottom; see one after 21 - move annotation)
>
> 10:
> A + fits in action area -> reusable?
> B + bigger
>
> 11-14: green (A) vs. white vertex (B) for "object to be processes"
> B - why 8 and 9 without white vertex?
>
> 15:
> A + simple message
>
> 16-17:
> A - not clear message (16 taken from GIMP)
> B - hard to recognize, 17 too dark
>
> 18:
> A - too smal arrow
> B - "i" in strange place
>
> 19:
> A & B both are unclear
>
> 20-21:
> A - not typical
> B - bookmark (but spatial?); breaks "without perspective view" rule
>
> 22-25:
> A + consistent
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
More information about the Qgis-developer
mailing list