Rif: [Qgis-developer] Backporting bugs for 1.7.5

Nathan Woodrow madmanwoo at gmail.com
Thu Mar 8 09:23:42 EST 2012


What kind of stuff did you have in mind.  Most things in master, minus a
hand full, will be backported to 1.8

- Nathan

On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Etienne Tourigny
<etourigny.dev at gmail.com>wrote:

> OK got it.
>
> Is there a central place we can request for back-porting of specific
> features/bugfixes to 1.8 ?
>
> Regards,
> Etienne
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:40 AM,  <jr.morreale at enoreth.net> wrote:
> > No because master is already far beyond the existing 1.8 branch and
> breaks
> > the 1.x API
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:31:53 -0300, Etienne Tourigny wrote:
> >>
> >> Would it make sense marking the master branch as 1.8 instead of having
> >> to backport many things?
> >>
> >> Etienne
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Werner Macho <werner.macho at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> hi!
> >>> It seems that 1.8 will overrule the 1.7 branch ..
> >>> As 1.8 prepares the way for 2.0 and has much more features than 1.7
> >>> and it seems that 1.8 will be here in about a month (and will also
> >>> stay a lot longer than 1.7) it seems better to concentrate on
> >>> releasing 1.8 (I know there are still bugs in 1.7) ..
> >>> As Paolo already said we lack in manpower to prepare 3 different
> >>> branches (1.7, 1.8 and master).
> >>> So please wait a little more for the Lyon HF - it seems that 1.8 is on
> >>> its way ..
> >>>
> >>> After 1.8 release we will collect (and hopefully clean the bugtracker)
> >>> new backport bugs for 1.8
> >>>
> >>> kind regards
> >>> Werner
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Paolo Cavallini <
> cavallini at faunalia.it>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Il 02/03/2012 07:45, luca_manganelli at comune.trento.it ha scritto:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Agreed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I know I'm boring, but backporting requires some manpower we have
> >>>> difficulties
> >>>> allocating now. Please consider helping directly with it, or
> sponsoring
> >>>> it.
> >>>> I agree, it would be really good. We just discovered the road graph
> >>>> plugin is
> >>>> non-functional, for instance.
> >>>> All the best.
> >>>> --
> >>>> Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
> >>>> www.faunalia.eu
> >>>> Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Qgis-developer mailing list
> >>>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> >>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Qgis-developer mailing list
> >>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Qgis-developer mailing list
> >> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-developer mailing list
> > Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20120309/0d6c1e07/attachment-0001.html


More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list