[Qgis-developer] gsoc 2012
G. Allegri
giohappy at gmail.com
Thu Mar 22 10:59:00 EDT 2012
The purpose of a "geoprocessing framework" was exactly that, unify the way
algorithms get exposed to the user.
Victor has given a big boost to this with SEXTANTE, and it should let the
user mix the modules easily to set up processing flows from different
algorithms...
giovanni
2012/3/22 Alexander Bruy <alexander.bruy at gmail.com>
> 2012/3/22 Alexander Bruy <alexander.bruy at gmail.com>:
> > Well, but what about GSoC and ideas related to QGIS Processing
> > Framework? This thread was started from Sergey's GSoC proposal
> > focused on extending QGIS Processing Framework with new
> > algorithms.
> >
> > 2012/3/22 Werner Macho <werner.macho at gmail.com>:
> >> Hi that's what i meant in my mail ..
> >> We should look after a solution to present everything (all algorythms)
> >> under one umbrella (one central point) sorted after functionality (or
> >> something else) ..
> >> It's always good to have more instruments to solve problems .. but you
> >> have to find (and activate) them..
> >> So i still suggest to meet in lyon and decide howto deal with
> >> different frameworks ..
> >> Especially when Victor is coming to lyon .. and probably some other
> >> framework developers too ..
> >> I'd like to see many different approaches and solutions but only one
> >> place to find them all to work with..
> >
> > --
> > Alexander Bruy
>
>
>
> --
> Alexander Bruy
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20120322/e1af67ae/attachment.html
More information about the Qgis-developer
mailing list