[Qgis-developer] Directions needed for GSOC Proposal

G. Allegri giohappy at gmail.com
Mon Mar 26 08:26:28 EDT 2012

I would keep it LGPL. I'm not interested in wrapping it in proprietary
code, but to use proprietary code through SEXTANTE...


2012/3/26 Peter Borissow <peter.borissow at yahoo.com>

> Do you need to GPL all of SETANTE or just the glueware (e.g. QGIS plugin)?
> In otherwords, is there a way to keep the SEXTANTE core MIT or LGPL?
>   ------------------------------
> *From:* Victor Olaya <volayaf at gmail.com>
> *To:* cavallini at faunalia.it
> *Cc:* qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> *Sent:* Monday, March 26, 2012 6:10 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Qgis-developer] Directions needed for GSOC Proposal
> Then, I guess there is no discussion. As I said, in this case there is
> no difference from my point of view, so GPL is a good option for
> Regards
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20120326/9cd3334b/attachment.html

More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list