[Qgis-developer] Proposal: QGIS Processing Framework improvements

[G. Allegri]

You've done a great work Camilo, and obviously it's always a good thing
having multiple approaches to the things, because it can be a richness. I
only wonder if those working on such frameworks could converge to a common
effort, somehow.

Probably you and Victor will desire to follow your own routes. In that case
I hope the best results to both: we will have the opportunity to chose the
best fitting solution ;)

giovanni

2012/3/26 Camilo Polymeris <cpolymeris at gmail.com>

> Hello all,
> as you may know (or not), I participated in last year's GSoC with
> Quantum GIS, creating a "Processing Framework", that allows the user
> access to data analysis tools from the GIS UI:
>
> http://polymeris.github.com/qgis/
>
> The focus last year was on the general framework & SAGA support. This
> was very well received, and we saw the addition of Orfeo as a backend.
> There are also plans to add support to further libraries & to create a
> "module workflow builder", a graphical interface to the interaction
> capabilities provided by the framework.
>
> The experience was very rewarding, so I'd like to apply again this
> year, with a project to improve on last year's work, adding
> multithreaded support, UI improvements & SAGA support for the
> remaining modules.
>
> The full proposal can be seen at the GSoC page:
>
>
> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/polymeris/11002
>
> Any comments are very welcome.
>
> Regards,
> Camilo
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20120326/7ad9d261/attachment-0001.html