[Qgis-developer] Merging of incompatible changes

Tim Sutton lists at linfiniti.com
Sat Oct 27 10:37:30 PDT 2012


Hi Martin

On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Martin Dobias <wonder.sk at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Tim
>
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Tim Sutton <lists at linfiniti.com> wrote:
>> In terms of the release roadmap for 2.0 the following
>> items were discussed in the hackfest in Essen as being the key
>> features we would hold the release for:
>>
>> 1) Raster overhaul
>> 2) WMTS Support
>> 3) Atlas integration for composer
>> 4) WCS Client support
>> 5) Transactional WFS support for QGIS Server
>> 6) SIP Bindings revision
>> 7) Symbology overhaul (needs support for random colour assignment and
>> property change on multiselections)
>> 8) Sextante
>> 9) Threading (non blocker wait fro 3.0)
>> 10) Labelling overhaul
>> 11) Diagrams overhaul (and remove of old implementation)
>> 12) Oracle support (non blocker for 2.0)
>> 13) Web site and docs update
>> 14) Universal usage of expression builder
>>
>> We agreed that when these features are present we will roll out the
>> release, with the hope that that could take place early next year.
>> Come end of December I think we should take a look at the items listed
>> and if any are obviously not making headway we should remove them from
>> the blocker list or find out if there is a way to bring them to the
>> foreground. The list above was also not intended to be exclusive, so
>> if other developments are offered for incorporation they will be
>> considered and accepted / declined on their merits.
>
> Thanks for the clarification. Even though I do not not fully
> understand some items, it gives an idea of the plans. Would be good to
> have a wiki page with few more details and status of the items: not
> started / in progress / done.
>

Thanks I will be moving the checklists from the wiki into the
governance docs and will try to put more details there.

>
>> A last 'dreaming of a nicer vector api' note for Martin: Since you are
>> adjusting the feature iterator API, wouldn't it also be nice to
>> support this:
>>
>> for reading:
>>
>>     while myProvider.nextFeature(myFeature):  # or equivalent in new api
>>         myGeometry = myFeature.geometry()
>>         myFooValue = myFeature['foo']
>>         .... do stuff .....
>
> Good news, that's on the branch already ;-)

Wohooo! Does that work for C++ api too?

Regards

Tim


>
> Cheers
> Martin



-- 
Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
==============================================
Please do not email me off-list with technical
support questions. Using the lists will gain
more exposure for your issues and the knowledge
surrounding your issue will be shared with all.

Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
 * QGIS programming and support services
 * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans
 * FOSS Consulting Services
Skype: timlinux
Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
==============================================


More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list