[Qgis-developer] Preventing plugin conflicts at 2.0

Anita Graser anitagraser at gmx.at
Thu Apr 11 08:53:38 PDT 2013


+1
I think this is very important to reduce stress caused by the API and
therefore plugin break.

Anita


On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Gary Sherman <gsherman at geoapt.com> wrote:

> Greetings developers,
>
> I think we should consider a way to flag existing plugins that are not
> compatible with the new 2.0 api. This will improve user experience by
> preventing install of plugins that do not work with the users current QGIS
> version.
>
> Ideally all plugins would be converted to work with both 1.8 and 2.0, but
> this either won't happen completely or will take an unknown amount of time.
>
> This situation has already happened to those living on the bleeding edge
> (using 1.9 in production):
>
> http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/57718/qgis-trace-tool-error/57724#57724
>
> One way to do this is to implement a "QGIS maximum version" entry in the
> plugins metadata (or __init__.py). Alternatively there may be a way to do
> this with the plugin repository app, however I'm not familiar enough with
> its implementation to suggest how that could be done.
>
> Please provide feedback...
>
>
> -- gary
> -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
> Gary Sherman
> Chair, QGIS Project Steering Committee
> -Desktop GIS Book:
>  *http://desktopgisbook.com
> -Alaska Novel:
>  *http://alaskana.co
> -Geospatial Consulting & Hosting:
>  *http://geoapt.com
> "We work virtually everywhere"
> -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20130411/28a7eaf9/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list