[Qgis-developer] fTools and GdalTools: sextante vs original plugins
volayaf at gmail.com
Wed Apr 17 00:24:49 PDT 2013
I am sorry to hear about your bad experience. Could you detail a bit
more about what you are doing (algorithms you are running, etc)?.
PostGIS layers should work without problems, but I have recently fixed
a problem with PostGIS when using SAGA algorithms, so there might be
other issues like that.
If you want, you can send me your layers and model, so I can have a
look and try to find out what is happening
Many thanks for your collaboration (and patience)
2013/4/17 Bernhard Ströbl <bernhard.stroebl at jena.de>:
> Hi all,
> for a course I am about to give tomorrow I played a bit with SEXTANTE,
> although I am going to teach geoprocessing with fTools (we are using QGIS
> 1.8). It was my first go with SEXTANTE and I was about to show what it will
> offer in the future. Therefore I built a small model with three input layers
> a buffer and two overlay operations. I did not succeed in running the model
> so I tried in current master.
> As it currently is SEXTANTE is not operable for me (or I am doing it wrong):
> First message is "Layers do not all use the same CRS...." although they
> definitely do and the same EPSG-code is noted in square brackets behind each
> layer name!? Second I get an "Error executing algorithm..." it seems as
> SEXTANTE cannot use PostGIS layers as input (when I save them as shape files
> the model runs perfectly), this is a big limitation as my institution stores
> almost everything in PostGIS. (SEXTANTE should not offer PostGIS layers to
> choose as input layers then).
> Well, this was a very disappointing experience because additionally QGIS was
> frozen two or three times opening or closing the model. I do not want to
> complain, all I want is to ask for keeping fTools as they are until SEXTANTE
> can _really_ replace them in all aspects. Then we should remove the vector
> menue completely because I agree that finding the tool you are looking for
> is a lot easier in SEXTANTE.
> my 2 cents
> Am 17.04.2013 07:42, schrieb Anita Graser:
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Mathieu Pellerin <nirvn.asia at gmail.com
>> <mailto:nirvn.asia at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> There might be a way to make most people happy here.
>> I find the vector menu a nice ui shortcut for useful functions. If
>> sextante relevant functions are at par (or better), couldn't the
>> vector menu items stay, which would please many, and when clicked
>> triggers sextante's function dialogue? Victor? Same thing could
>> happen with vector menu too. Sextante's analysis toolbar is super
>> useful but might be a throwback for some if vector / raster menu
>> functions disappear.
>> On human resource (coders and testers) and maintenance angles,
>> keeping to mechanism to do same thing is an obvious waste.
>> I see. So you'd suggest to keep only Sextante code (where duplicates
>> exist!) but provide shortcuts from the menu? I'd +1 that.
>> I've been testing a variety of functions in the menus and in Sextante
>> over the last days and there are always some broken ones. Neither
>> "package" is without major bugs today.
>> We need to get it together for 2.0 and that's easier if we can focus on
>> Best wishes,
> __________ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus signature
> database 8235 (20130416) __________
> The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
More information about the Qgis-developer