[Qgis-developer] Final Logo Pick

[pcreso at pcreso.com]

So "Quantum" should NOT be part of the branding?

I'm not saying either way - but one part of the debate I have not seen discussed (missed it?) is whether the brand we want to market is QGIS, Quantum GIS or both.

If we can decide on that aspect, deciding on the logo may be easier.

Cheers

Brent Wood


--- On Sat, 5/18/13, Nathan Woodrow <madmanwoo at gmail.com> wrote:

From: Nathan Woodrow <madmanwoo at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] Final Logo Pick
To: "Alessandro Pasotti" <apasotti at gmail.com>
Cc: "qgis-developer" <qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>
Date: Saturday, May 18, 2013, 7:28 PM

To me this is the look that I like [0] [1]
[0] https://www.dropbox.com/s/okpdl3vvs9o25na/logo-nw-word.png

[1] https://www.dropbox.com/s/mqshl3pxhdlz47d/logo-nw.png
Following the git logo style.


- Nathan


On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Alessandro Pasotti <apasotti at gmail.com> wrote:


2013/5/18 Nathan Woodrow <madmanwoo at gmail.com>





+1 from me too.  This has been the feedback I have had from users and hence the reason that I started that comp.  
Personally I like the cut out look that the new git logo has now http://git-scm.com/downloads/logos







+1

I would like to see something in between the first and the last in #394, I mean, I like the look of the first #394 (and #50) but the lower right triangle of the Q should be more pronounced (but not as much as in the last #394).




-- 
Alessandro Pasotti
w3:   www.itopen.it




-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20130518/9d51d48f/attachment.html>