[Qgis-developer] State of Spatialite 4.0 and GDAL 1.10 for QGIS 2.0?

[Giuseppe Sucameli]

Hi all,

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:22 PM, <a.furieri at lqt.it> wrote:

> On Tue, 21 May 2013 20:42:35 +0000, Cline, Royce L. wrote:
>
>> The other issue I have had with SpatiaLite 4 is with DB Manager. DB
>> Manager does not recognize geometry for a table in a Spatialite 4
>> created database (new spatial metadata). Displays the same as a table
>> without geometry. If the database was created with Spatialite 3 or
>> converted to a version 3 database with spatialite_convert, then it
>> will show the table as having geometry. It would appear that DB
>> Manager is not testing whether the database containing the table is
>> using the new or old version of the spatial metadata.
>>
>>
> the second issue (DB Manager) requires few more considerations.
> [...]
> if the developer decided to completely skip
> using any appropriate "abstract" SQL function so to directly perform
> some INSERT or UPDATE statement affecting the Spatial Metadata tables,


no insert nor update statements are performed to understand what's the
layer's geometry type, and the db v4.0 wasn't created by DB Manager

Surely the problem is a different one, I guess it could depend on the
python connector DB Manager uses, aka the pyspatialite library.

Cheers.


> bye Sandro
>
> --
> Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o
> contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e'
> risultato non infetto.
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/qgis-**developer<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer>
>



-- 
Giuseppe Sucameli
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20130522/40ca3fbd/attachment.html>