[Qgis-developer] QGIS 2 64bits, is it stable ?

[Jonathan Moules]

Assuming it's not already done, I'd suggest that requiring Unit Tests for
all new features should be mandatory for a Pull Request/patch to be
accepted into QGIS. In the long term that would hopefully help alleviate
the significant number of regressions that we're seeing in 2.0.

Jonathan

On 3 October 2013 11:51, Régis Haubourg <regis.haubourg at eau-adour-garonne.fr
> wrote:

> Hi Matthias. agreed.
> How to fund, this is the question. I have budget (at least at the moment).
> I haven't been able to spend it completly in 2.0 release sprint because all
> goes too fast for classical contract, where I'm constrained to pay for a
> specific work (debug or feature).
> Please be warned to public finances are not good in europe, and every
> unconsumed budget can be erased.
> Sponsoring should be a way to finance infrastructure consolidation, but in
> current rules, sponsoring can't be oriented.
>
> I need help from the community to have a serious real use case unit test
> suite. I'm ready to fund a part if PSC gives an infrastructure and a
> manager. If no work canvas is given, I'm sure I won't have any successfull
> commercial proposal to such a funding.
>
> I also kindly ask other funders to systematically include unit test
> developpement for every new feature.
>
> Again today, I found 3 regressions, hard to find. I thought once 2.0 was
> out, I could spend less time testing, and more time working. It's still not
> the case.
>
> Again, you gave a lot unpaid work, when I was struggling to find a way to
> spend some..
> Hope we'll find a way.
> Régis
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-2-64bits-is-it-stable-tp5081507p5081586.html
> Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>

-- 
This transmission is intended for the named addressee(s) only and may 
contain sensitive or protectively marked material up to RESTRICTED and 
should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or 
authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or 
disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error 
please notify the sender immediately. All email traffic sent to or from us, 
including without limitation all GCSX traffic, may be subject to recording 
and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20131003/e942cf88/attachment.html>