[Qgis-developer] Ugly jumping maps while zooming

Richard Duivenvoorde rdmailings at duif.net
Tue Dec 23 02:10:06 PST 2014


On 23-12-14 08:06, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Hi Nyall,
> 
> Il 22/12/2014 23:47, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
> 
>> I disagree - while there may be an issue with the difficulty of getting
>> wide testing of pull requests, the solution isn't to allow broken code
>> into master.
> 
> You're right, we're big boys now, must behave. However:
> * the code is in good shape, not broken; works smoothly in a variety of
> situations
> * it opens a whole set of new and exciting applications, e.g. live
> tracking, drone monitoring, etc.
> * there are unsupported functions, as pointed out
> * if we remove it from master, it will soon become unmergeable, and will
> probably get lost; it happened several times in the past that what we
> left out of the door was never recovered.
> Overall, I still believe keeping it, but letting conscious users
> activate it when necessary, is a good compromise.
> In the meantime, we can start raising funds to complete the set of
> necessary features (I do not think it's a huge amount of work, once the
> money is found we have time to implement these for 2.8).
> All the best, and thanks for your thoughts.

I agree with Paolo, and also see the value of Sandro's argument that
developing such functionality in a branch get's much less
testing/viewing and is very hard to merge back. Myself I only had a
serious look at it when it was in master...

So as long as we can hide it for normal users (even without tickbox, we
can make a cli-option for it :-) ), AND nothing is broken I'm in favour
of letting it in master.

I think Sandro should hide the spinbox in the statusbar for now, and
nay-sayers should now try to find bugs related to rotation work?

There is a PSC-meeting on 2th januari, let's make the final decision there.

Regards,

Richard Duivenvoorde


More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list