[Qgis-developer] Failing tests consider blockers

[Nathan Woodrow]

Ok having a think about this, you have convinced me this is the way to go.
Carry on :)

Nathan
On 19/02/2014 10:56 pm, "Jürgen E." <jef at norbit.de> wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> On Wed, 19. Feb 2014 at 18:32:39 +0700, Martin Dobias wrote:
> > Agreed. If we decided to do time-based releases, let's do them as
> > planned and not discuss the decision two days before the planned
> > release...
>
> Thanks, although I've already discarded my unfinished post after Marco's
> mail
> ;)
>
> > I think we should mainly reconsider which bugs should be marked as
> > blockers. The current policy "every regression is a blocker" does not
> > make sense to me. In my opinion a blocker is something that makes the
> > software unusable for potentially large amount of users - in such case
> > it makes sense to delay the release for few days (as an exception, not
> > a rule).
>
> Right, and that's was going to be my answer to Nathan's mail - discarded
> too :)
>
> A blocker just needs to be severe - and that's about it.  It doesn't
> matter to
> me if it's a bug in a new feature or a regression.
>
>
> Jürgen
>
> --
> Jürgen E. Fischer         norBIT GmbH               Tel. +49-4931-918175-31
> Dipl.-Inf. (FH)           Rheinstraße 13            Fax. +49-4931-918175-50
> Software Engineer         D-26506 Norden
> http://www.norbit.de
> QGIS PSC member (RM)      Germany                      IRC: jef on FreeNode
>
> --
> norBIT Gesellschaft fuer Unternehmensberatung und Informationssysteme mbH
> Rheinstrasse 13, 26506 Norden
> GF: Jelto Buurman, HR: Amtsgericht Emden, HRB 5502
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20140219/08018dca/attachment.html>