[Qgis-developer] Identify with Feature Form on QGIS 2.2

[Etienne Tourigny]

shouldn't there be a tag 'backport' tag in the tracker to identify critical
tickets that warrant a backport to stable branch, so if someone has the
time can backport those fixes?


On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at> wrote:

> We also have this blocker issue in 2.2.0 because it wasn't completely
> fixed after all: http://hub.qgis.org/issues/9396
>
> Best wishes,
> Anita
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Etienne Tourigny
> <etourigny.dev at gmail.com> wrote:
> > There are going to be a few other bugs, hopefully fixed in 2.2, so
> > eventually a point release will be worthwhile. With (semi-)automated
> builds
> > it's not *that* much trouble I think.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Sandro Santilli <strk at keybit.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:09:30PM +1000, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
> >> > hmmm that is a real bugger.  Yeah I think kind of thing warrants a bug
> >> > fix
> >> > release.  This will kill QGIS for most users who do data entry, which
> is
> >> > most of the people I know.
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> A 2.2.1 could come out after 1 week of no activity in the stable branch
> >> after
> >> any activity.
> >>
> >> If it takes 4 months to get to that state (ie: nobody pushes a fix for
> >> that
> >> or more than one fix a week gets committed weekly) then no 2.2.1 would
> >> ever
> >> come out.
> >>
> >> --strk;
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Qgis-developer mailing list
> >> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-developer mailing list
> > Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20140225/89f01588/attachment.html>