[Qgis-developer] Realease and blockers
Andreas Neumann
a.neumann at carto.net
Fri Jun 6 02:42:50 PDT 2014
Hi,
I kind of agree. I also think the one month testing phase is too short
to properly deal with all of the bugs.
Maybe a six month release cycle with 4 month development and 2 month
testing would be more useful in the future.
Furthermore, we would probably need at least one bugfix release.
But I know you have discussed this back and forth ... and there is no
single solution that fits for everyone.
---------
BTW: I believe our finances would allow to again sponsor 1 week of paid
bug fixing from the QGIS funds. Like with the past two releases. Has the
PSC discussed this?
Andreas
Am 06.06.2014 09:36, schrieb Régis Haubourg:
> BTW, the very short release cycle is really complicated for us. Deploying
> prod version and testing new versions periods overshoot here. I'm alone on
> that topic, and partial time only. Having longer release candidate period,
> and a 6 months release cycle could help for me.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Realease-and-blockers-tp5144366p5144375.html
> Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
More information about the Qgis-developer
mailing list