[Qgis-developer] Qgis server is really compliant OGC?

[Andrea Peri]

Hi, I update the ticket.

The first problem is that the tag GetLegendGraphics is without a namespace.
This is pretty easy to resolve.

Unfortunately after resolve this there is two more complex problems.

The GetStyle and GetPrint tags.

The first is a dismissed tag from OGC available in WMS 1.1.0 and not
available in WMS 1.3.0.
Unfortunately the qgis declare its capabilities to be Version=1.3.0.

The second tag GetPrint seem to be a total invention f GetPrint.

AFAI it don't be include in a GetCapabilities response that is uniquely
dedicate to list standard elements.

If QGIS need to report this information it should be add another kind of
response something like:
"GetQGISCapabilities" and put inside it all the tags it need and are not
available in the standard WMS.

Regards,

Andrea.




2014-06-07 9:30 GMT+02:00 Andrea Peri <aperi2007 at gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> I open a ticket for this.
> http://hub.qgis.org/issues/10489
>
> Also I do some tests.
> Comparing the qgis-server response with the MapServer response.
> The images I attach to the ticket show clearly where is the bug in the
> qgis response.
>
> Is wrong the position of GetLegendGraphics tag.
>
> I need to resolve this because this mean that qgis-server is not compliant
> with OGC spcs, and this mean also that it is not working with other client
> rather than qgis itself This mean also that qgis wms client will not do a
> test of validation and perhaps this explain because something it will crash
> or dont'work perfectly.
> ;)
>
> More important for me, this mean that qgis-server surely is not usable for
> Inspire liek infrastructure, and this is a blocking question for any
> european organization that plan to fund on qgis as a server for its
> infrastructure (like us). I geuss this could be important also for other
> european and inspire menbers of europe.
>
> However I guess this is (perhaps) a simple correction.
> But of course I should not break any other thinks.
>
> Realisticly I don guess that there is a specific need to have the
> getlegendgraphics in the actual posizion.
> So move it in another position and resolve so this kind of invalidity
> should be quite transparent to all other tools.
>
> I like to know if this solution (change the position of GetLegendGraphics
> in the Capabilites response) is an acceptable solution for others or it may
> break something ?
>
> Please also notice that I don't know if there is some other invalidity
> because xmlspy is a DOM validator and stop to the first invalidity found.
>
> I don't know if was able to produce directly a patch or use the support of
> some expert.
> But before to work on this I like to know any opinion.
>
> Thx,
>
> A.
>
>
> 2014-06-07 9:17 GMT+02:00 Andrea Peri <aperi2007 at gmail.com>:
>
> A: "qgis-developer ML" <qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>
>> Cc:
>>
>> Hi i see the getcapabilities returned from QS is not xsd valid.
>> This  deny use it in many usecases rather then getmap.
>> We fund often qgis develop. But i Mike understand why qgis has an
>> invalido xml respinse. Is this a not importante questione for the qgis
>> developer. Also i like understand if resolve this is acceptable or noto.
>> THX
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------
> Andrea Peri
> . . . . . . . . .
> qwerty àèìòù
> -----------------
>



-- 
-----------------
Andrea Peri
. . . . . . . . .
qwerty àèìòù
-----------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20140607/aea535b6/attachment.html>