[Qgis-developer] [Qgis-user] LIZMAP ERROR PRINT - HELP!

Marco Hugentobler marco.hugentobler at sourcepole.ch
Wed Jun 11 01:57:34 PDT 2014


Hi

I agree that most clients will not be affected by a change in the 
GetCapabilities response. However, the release is quite close, therefore 
it will be good to not change the capabilities document now.

After release, we might remove the additional elements from 
GetCapabilities. When GetProjectSettings has been introduced, we did not 
change it immediately to give clients a bit time to catch up.

Speaking about OGC compliancy in general: I heard from developers in 
other projects that probably each product needs small tweaks before 
passing the compliance tests (and not only the validation of the 
capabilities response is tested). So if someone wants to look into that 
and provide (constructive) feedback, that will be greatly appreciated.

Regards,
Marco

On 11.06.2014 10:25, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Wed, 11. Jun 2014 at 08:39:11 +0200, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>> It is true that in some cases we need to improve to be more standards
>> compliant. This is a group effort. Everybody can contribute. Removing
>> GetPrint from GetCapabilities, or implementing in a standard compliant way,
>> would help. We could still have it listed in GetProjectSettings.
> It's disputable if the current way is not compliant.
>
> Changing that might break clients that query the capabilities for the presense
> of GetPrint if we'd applied a (less-disputable ;)) compliant prefix (ie.
> GetPrint to qgis:GetPrint).
>
> Note that this would only apply to the name of the operation element in
> capabilities, the actual request wouldn't need to changed.
>
> So it's unclear to me if there are actually any clients that would break.
>
> At least some already use GetProjectSettings, others might just imply GetPrint
> without checking GetCapabilities - both groups wouldn't be affected.
>
> The clients that check capabilities would just need to look for qgis:GetPrint
> instead or alternatively of GetPrint - and that should just be a trivial
> change, when 2.4 is deployed.
>
> Also there are probably not that many clients around that actually use
> GetPrint.
>
>
> Jürgen
>


-- 
Dr. Marco Hugentobler
Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
marco.hugentobler at sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch
Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee



More information about the Qgis-developer mailing list